Mazda 3 2016 vs Kia Ceed 2015

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Kia Ceed
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP130 HP
Torque: 210 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds11.5 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 10 HP less power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 50 NM more than Kia Ceed. Despite less power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.66.8
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 3 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1010 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.31 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 3 is 16 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8351`840
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Kia Ceed has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10 4007800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Kia Ceed has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv