Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 2016 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 3 2013, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.2 | |
|
The Mazda 3 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 3 2016 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2013, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1334 litres | 1263 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |