Mazda 3 2016 vs Fiat Tipo 2017

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Fiat Tipo
2017 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 165 HP110 HP
Torque: 210 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds11.5 seconds
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 3 engine produces 55 HP more power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Fiat Tipo. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.86.3
Mazda 3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1080 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.37 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1334 litresno data
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Tipo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8151`820
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

low
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10 40010 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Fiat Tipo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv