Mazda 3 2016 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 3 engine produces 55 HP more power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Fiat Tipo. Thanks to more power Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.3 | |
| Mazda 3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 3 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower. Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1334 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |