Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 100 HP100 HP
Torque: 150 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds10.8 seconds
Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2013 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 3 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.1
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1180 km on highway
790 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1263 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`800
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10 4007800
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 3 has
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv