Mazda 3 2016 vs Volvo V40 2016

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Volvo V40
2016 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP152 HP
Torque: 150 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds8.3 seconds
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 3 engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.8no data
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres62 litres
720 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.37 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres324 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1500 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`835no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Volvo V40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10 40013 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv