Mazda 3 2016 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 3 engine produces 10 HP more power than Fiat Tipo, but torque is 2 NM less than Fiat Tipo. Despite the higher power, Mazda 3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that by driving the Mazda 3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower. Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 440 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |