Mazda 3 2013 vs Mazda 2 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.3 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 104 - 165 HP | 75 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 380 NM | 119 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 13.5 seconds | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.3 | 4.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, a Mazda 3 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 3 is 67 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 has 169 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Mazda 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`846 | ~ 1`499 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests, but Mazda 2 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |