Mazda 3 2011 vs Mazda 3 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 167 HP | 105 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 270 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 13.1 seconds | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 8.2 | 4.4 - 8.1 | |
|
Mazda 3 2011 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3 2009. On average, Mazda 3 2011 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 119 - 155 mm (4.7 - 6.1 inches) | 150 - 155 mm (5.9 - 6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 2009 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2011 and Mazda 3 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`794 | ~ 1`827 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |