Mazda 3 2011 vs Honda Civic 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 167 HP | 140 - 142 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 270 NM | 174 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 13.1 seconds | 8.7 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 8.2 | 6.6 - 6.7 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 440 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.56 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1.16 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`794 | ~ 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |