Mazda 3 2009 vs Honda Accord 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 185 HP | 150 - 268 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 400 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | 7.9 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.1 | 5.6 - 8.8 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 3 is 18 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 467 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 37 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`827 | ~ 1`995 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |