Mazda 3 2009 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 185 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 400 NM | 143 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | 9.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.1 | 6.1 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 and Mitsubishi Lancer are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Mazda 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`827 | ~ 1`831 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |