Mazda 3 2006 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 3 is available with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 260 HP | 280 - 359 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 380 NM | 366 - 492 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | 4.1 - 6.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 9.7 | 14.2 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 5.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is smaller. Mazda 3 is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1285 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`796 | ~ 2`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 37 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |