Mazda 3 2006 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.3 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 260 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 380 NM | 145 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | 9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 9.7 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Mazda 3 2006 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3 2003. On average, Mazda 3 2006 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2006 and Mazda 3 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1285 litres | 675 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2006 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2003, which means Mazda 3 2006 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`796 | ~ 1`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |