Mazda 3 2013 vs Volkswagen Golf 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Golf can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.5 - 2.51.2 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 187 HP85 - 300 HP
Torque: 144 - 380 NM160 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 13.6 seconds4.9 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.1 - 7.63.8 - 7.1
On average, the Mazda 3 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Golf. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)128 - 142 mm (5 - 5.6 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.26 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Mazda 3 is 22 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1270 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 7 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`864~ 1`818
Safety:
The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 76009000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv