Mazda 3 2013 vs Ford Focus 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 187 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 380 NM | 150 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | 8.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 7.6 | 5.0 - 6.4 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 11 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 277 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 has 87 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`864 | ~ 1`938 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |