Mazda 3 2013 vs Audi A3 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Audi A3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)

Performance

Power: 100 - 187 HP105 - 184 HP
Torque: 144 - 380 NM175 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 13.6 seconds6.8 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.1 - 7.61.5 - 6.5
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.31 m
Width: 1.79 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Mazda 3 is larger.
Mazda 3 is 16 cm longer than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litres1220 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 43 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`864~ 1`837
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests, but Audi A3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 780010 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv