Mazda 3 2013 vs Toyota Auris 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Toyota Auris
2013 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.51.3 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 187 HP90 - 136 HP
Torque: 144 - 380 NM128 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 13.6 seconds10 - 12.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.1 - 7.63.8 - 5.9
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Auris. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)135 mm (5.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.28 m
Width: 1.79 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 3 is 20 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres360 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1263 litresno data
Mazda 3 has 4 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Auris.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`864~ 1`822
Safety:
The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 78008000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Toyota Auris has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv