Mazda 3 2013 vs Kia Ceed 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 187 HP | 128 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 380 NM | 164 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | 7.7 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 7.6 | 3.7 - 7.6 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger. Mazda 3 is 16 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`864 | ~ 1`874 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |