Mazda 3 2013 vs Kia Ceed 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 187 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 380 NM | 137 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | 10.3 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 7.6 | 4.4 - 7.6 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 21 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1263 litres | 1300 litres | |
| Mazda 3 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 37 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`864 | ~ 1`772 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |