Mazda 3 2013 vs Hyundai i30 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 187 HP | 90 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 380 NM | 137 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | 9.9 - 13.5 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda 3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Hyundai i30. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 7.6 | 3.8 - 6.7 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i30. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 3 is 17 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 378 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1263 litres | 1316 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 53 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`864 kg | ~ 1`866 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`251 kg | ~ 1`323 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 613 kg | ~ 543 kg | |
| Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Hyundai i30. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |