Mazda 3 2009 vs Mazda 3 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 105 - 260 HP105 - 260 HP
Torque: 145 - 400 NM145 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.1 - 13.1 seconds6.1 - 13.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 9.64.3 - 9.6
Mazda 3 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3 2011. On average, a Mazda 3 2009 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 3 2011.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 145 - 155 mm (5.7 - 6.1 inches)119 - 155 mm (4.7 - 6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 2009 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2009 and Mazda 3 2011 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 481 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litres1360 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2009 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 3 2011, which means Mazda 3 2009 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`856~ 1`864
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 42005200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv