Mazda 3 2003 vs Opel Astra 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.3 - 2.3 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 84 - 160 HP | 80 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 122 - 245 NM | 125 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 14.3 seconds | 7.9 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.2 | 4.9 - 9.4 | |
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Astra. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Mazda 3 is larger. Mazda 3 is 20 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
878 litres | 1330 litres | |
Mazda 3 has 101 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 452 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Astra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`728 | ~ 1`799 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
| |