Mazda 3 2019 vs Skoda Octavia 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 186 HP | 110 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 153 - 270 NM | 200 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 12.1 seconds | 6.9 - 10.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.8 | 3.7 - 5.0 | |
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 600 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1555 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 150 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`905 | ~ 1`911 | |
Safety: | |||
The Skoda Octavia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 600 | 21 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |