Mazda 3 2019 vs Skoda Octavia 2019

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2019 -
Skoda Octavia
2019 -
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.51.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 116 - 186 HP110 - 200 HP
Torque: 153 - 270 NM200 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 - 12.1 seconds6.9 - 10.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 7.83.7 - 5.0
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.69 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres600 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1555 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 150 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia.
Turning diameter: no data11.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`905~ 1`911
Safety:
The Skoda Octavia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 14 80022 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower price
Skoda Octavia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv