Mazda 3 2019 vs Skoda Octavia 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Skoda Octavia is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 250 HP | 110 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 434 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12.1 seconds | 6.7 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 8.7 | 1.0 - 7.3 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 - 140 mm (5.3 - 5.5 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1138 litres | 1555 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 150 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 417 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`913 kg | ~ 1`986 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`402 kg | ~ 1`399 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 511 kg | ~ 587 kg | |
| Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Skoda Octavia. Therefore, Skoda Octavia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Skoda Octavia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |