Mazda 3 2019 vs Kia Optima 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda 3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Optima can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 186 HP | 68 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 270 NM | 187 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 12.1 seconds | 7.4 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.8 | 1.6 - 8.5 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is smaller. Mazda 3 is 20 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 510 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`905 | ~ 2`077 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Kia Optima has
| |