Mazda 3 2019 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Mazda 3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 186 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 270 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.4 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 8.3 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 3 is 9 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 569 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1019 litres | 1500 litres | |
Mazda 3 has 234 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 481 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 1`978 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 21 400 | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |