Mazda 3 2019 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda 3 2019 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 2016 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 250 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 434 NM | 150 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12.4 seconds | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 9.0 | 3.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda 3 2019 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3 2016. On average, Mazda 3 2019 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 - 140 mm (5.3 - 5.5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 2016 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda 3 2016, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 2019 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 569 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1026 litres | 1334 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 2016 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 2016 (by 308 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 2019 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 3 2016, which means Mazda 3 2019 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`914 kg | ~ 1`857 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`400 kg | ~ 1`296 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 514 kg | ~ 561 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |