Mazda 3 2016 vs Toyota Corolla 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Toyota Corolla
2016 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)1.3 - 1.8 (petrol)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 100 - 184 HP99 - 140 HP
Torque: 144 - 380 NM128 - 173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 13.5 seconds10 - 12.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 8.15.6 - 6.6
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)125 mm (4.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.62 m
Width: 1.79 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres452 litres
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space.
Mazda 3 has 33 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla.
Gross weight: ~ 1`850 kg~ 1`765 kg
Net weight:~ 1`308 kg~ 1`125 kg
Load capacity:~ 542 kg~ 640 kg
Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Toyota Corolla. Therefore, Toyota Corolla is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 11 0009400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • higher ground clearance
Toyota Corolla has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv