Mazda 3 2016 vs Ford Focus 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 184 HP | 95 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 380 NM | 150 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 13.5 seconds | 8 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 8.1 | 4.5 - 6.7 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 475 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 56 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`850 | ~ 1`938 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Ford Focus has
| |