Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 184 HP | 100 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 380 NM | 150 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 13.5 seconds | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 8.1 | 3.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3 2016. On average, Mazda 3 2016 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2016. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda 3 2016 is 11 cm longer than the Mazda 3 2016, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1334 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 3 2016 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3 2016. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`850 | ~ 1`857 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |