Mazda 3 2016 vs Kia Cerato 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 184 HP | 130 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 380 NM | 157 - 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 13.5 seconds | 9.3 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 8.1 | 6.5 - 7.2 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 2 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 482 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`850 | ~ 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |