Mazda 3 2016 vs Hyundai Elantra 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 184 HP | 128 - 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 380 NM | 155 - 212 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 13.5 seconds | 8.8 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 8.1 | 6.6 - 7.2 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Elantra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 1 cm longer than the Hyundai Elantra, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Hyundai Elantra has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 39 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`850 | ~ 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |