Mazda 3 2016 vs Volvo V40 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Volvo V40
2016 - 2020
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.51.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 184 HP120 - 245 HP
Torque: 150 - 380 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 11.9 seconds6.3 - 10.5 seconds
In general, Volvo V40 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 8.43.4 - 5.9
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)144 mm (5.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.37 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1334 litres1500 litres
Mazda 3 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 166 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight: ~ 1`857 kg~ 1`978 kg
Net weight:~ 1`296 kg~ 1`499 kg
Load capacity:~ 561 kg~ 479 kg
Mazda 3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Volvo V40. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 980011 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv