Mazda 3 2016 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 184 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 380 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 8.4 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 3 is 10 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1334 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Mazda 3 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 166 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`857 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |