Mazda 3 2016 vs Audi A3 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Audi A3
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.5 - 2.51.2 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 100 - 184 HP90 - 250 HP
Torque: 150 - 380 NM148 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 11.9 seconds6.2 - 13.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 8.44.2 - 9.4
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)110 mm (4.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.29 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Mazda 3 is larger.
Mazda 3 is 18 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1334 litres1120 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 214 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`857~ 1`916
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 10 4006200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv