Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 184 HP | 100 - 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 380 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 8.4 | 4.1 - 7.6 | |
|
Mazda 3 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3 2013. On average, Mazda 3 2016 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1334 litres | 1263 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`857 kg | ~ 1`864 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`296 kg | ~ 1`251 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 561 kg | ~ 613 kg | |
| Mazda 3 2016 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Mazda 3 2013. Therefore, Mazda 3 2013 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 3 has
| |