Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
- choose version -
1.5 | 120 HP | Petrol | Automatic
/ Axela Hatchback 1.5L SKYACTIV-G | 100 HP | Petrol | Manual
/ Axela Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G | 165 HP | Petrol | Automatic
/ Axela Hatchback 2.0L SKYACTIV-G Automatic | 120 HP | Petrol | Automatic
/ Axela Hatchback 2.0L SKYACTIV-G | 120 HP | Petrol | Manual
/ Axela Hatchback 1.5L SKYACTIV-D Automatic | 105 HP | Diesel | Automatic
/ Axela Hatchback 1.5L SKYACTIV-D | 105 HP | Diesel | Manual
/ Axela Hatchback 2.2L SKYACTIV-D | 150 HP | Diesel | Manual
2.5 SkyActiv-G Automatic | 184 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.5 SkyActiv-G | 184 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.2 SkyActiv-D | 150 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
- choose version -
Mazda 3 SkyActiv-D 2.2 | 150 HP | Petrol | Manual
SkyActiv-D 2.2 Automatic | 150 HP | Petrol | Automatic
SkyActiv-G 1.5 | 120 HP | Petrol | Automatic
SkyActiv-G 1.6 | 104 HP | Petrol | Manual
SkyActiv-G 1.6 Automatic | 104 HP | Petrol | Automatic
SkyActiv-G 2.0 150 Hp Automatic | 150 HP | Petrol | Automatic
SkyActiv-G 2.0 120 Hp | 120 HP | Petrol | Manual
SkyActiv-G 2.0 120 Hp Automatic | 120 HP | Petrol | Automatic
1.5 SKYACTIV-G | 100 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.0 SKYACTIV-G 155 Hp | 155 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165 Hp | 165 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 184 Hp | 184 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 187 Hp | 187 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.2 SKYACTIV-D Automatic | 150 HP | Diesel | Automatic
2.2 SKYACTIV-D | 150 HP | Diesel | Manual
Gearbox:
Manual/Automatic Manual/Automatic
Engines:
1.5 - 2.5 1.5 - 2.5
Performance
Power:
100 - 184 HP 100 - 187 HP
Torque:
150 - 380 NM 144 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:
8.1 - 11.9 seconds 8.1 - 13.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
3.8 - 8.4 4.1 - 7.6
Mazda 3 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3 2013. On average, Mazda 3 2016 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version !
Ground clearance:
155 mm (6.1 inches) 155 mm (6.1 inches)
Dimensions
Length:
4.47 m 4.47 m
Width:
1.80 m 1.79 m
Height:
1.45 m 1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:
364 litres 364 litres
Trunk max capacity:with rear seats folded down
1334 litres 1263 litres
Turning diameter:
10.6 meters 10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg):
~ 1`857 ~ 1`864
Safety:
no data
Quality:
average
above average
Average price (€):
10 400 7000
Pros and Cons:
Mazda 3 has
lower fuel consumption for petrol engines fewer faults lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail