Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 3 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.51.5 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 100 - 184 HP100 - 187 HP
Torque: 150 - 380 NM144 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 11.9 seconds8.1 - 13.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 8.44.1 - 7.6
Mazda 3 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3 2013. On average, Mazda 3 2016 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3 2013.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 2016 and Mazda 3 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1334 litres1263 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`857~ 1`864
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 10 4007600
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 3 has
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv