Mazda 3 2016 vs Mazda 2 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Mazda 2
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.51.5

Performance

Power: 100 - 184 HP75 - 115 HP
Torque: 150 - 380 NM135 - 220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 11.9 seconds8.7 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 8.43.4 - 4.9
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)143 mm (5.6 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.06 m
Width: 1.80 m1.70 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Mazda 3 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 3 is 41 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 11 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 364 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1334 litres950 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 3 has 84 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 384 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Mazda 3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`857~ 1`525
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 10 4009600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Mazda 2 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv