Mazda 3 2016 vs Kia Ceed 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 184 HP | 100 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 380 NM | 137 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 8.4 | 4.2 - 6.8 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, Mazda 3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 3 is 16 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1334 litres | 1318 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 3 has 16 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Mazda 3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`857 | ~ 1`849 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |