Mazda 3 2016 vs Honda Civic 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 184 HP | 129 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 380 NM | 180 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 11.9 seconds | 8.2 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 8.4 | 4.7 - 5.8 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 3 is 5 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1334 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Mazda 3 has 56 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`857 | ~ 1`713 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |