Mazda 2 2008 vs Ford Fiesta 2005

 
Mazda 2
2008 - 2010
Ford Fiesta
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 103 HP80 HP
Torque: 137 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds13.2 seconds
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 2 engine produces 23 HP more power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Ford Fiesta. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km6.8 l/100km
By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta.
Fuel tank capacity: 43 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway910 km on highway
610 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 2 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years6 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Ford Focus
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.92 m
Width: 1.70 m1.68 m
Height: 1.48 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres284 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data945 litres
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space.
Mazda 2 has 34 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4851`525
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Mazda 2 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Fiesta, so Mazda 2 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 24001400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Ford Fiesta has
  • timing belt engine
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv