Mazda 2 2008 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 6 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 2 is 8 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 977 litres | |
| Mazda 2 has 4 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |