Mazda 2 2008 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 2 engine produces 19 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 220 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 2 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The Chevrolet Aveo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`503 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |