Mazda 2 2010 vs Toyota Yaris 2011

 
Mazda 2
2010 - 2015
Toyota Yaris
2011 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.4 Diesel
Petrol engines (Mazda 2) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Yaris) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 84 HP90 HP
Torque: 121 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds11.8 seconds
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 2 engine produces 6 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.13.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 2 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris.
Fuel tank capacity: 43 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1230 km on highway
660 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
Toyota Yaris gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years15 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 3Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota iQ
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect.
Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable.

Toyota Yaris 2011 1.4 engine: Toyota introduced this 1.4-liter turbocharged diesel engine in 2001, and production continued until 2017. It features a Bosch Common Rail fuel injection system, initially equipped with electromagnetic injectors until 2008. These were later replaced by non-repairable ...  More about Toyota Yaris 2011 1.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.89 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.48 m1.51 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres286 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data768 litres
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 2 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mazda 2 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4551`525
Safety:
The Toyota Yaris scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

above average
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Yaris has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 44004000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Toyota Yaris has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv