Mazda 2 2010 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 78 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 engine produces 6 HP more power than Alfa Romeo MiTo, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Alfa Romeo MiTo. Despite the higher power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 2 is 14 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 270 litres | |
| Mazda 2 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`455 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |