Mazda 2 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 24 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 3 | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Jazz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mazda 2 is 2 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 2 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 2 has 87 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Mazda 2 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`455 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |