Mazda 2 2003 vs Mazda 2 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 146 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 2003 and Mazda 2 2006 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda 2 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 2 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 2003 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 2 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 2003 and Mazda 2 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1044 litres | |
| Mazda 2 2003 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2 2006. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 2 has
| |