Mazda 2 2003 vs Ford Fusion 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Mazda 2 and Ford Fusion have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.4 | |
Mazda 2 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Ford Fiesta | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford Fusion might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
Mazda 2 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 2 is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Fusion, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 337 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1175 litres | |
Ford Fusion has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fusion (by 131 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Fusion. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | high | |
Ford Fusion has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 2, so Ford Fusion quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |