Mazda 2 2003 vs Ford Fiesta 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 22 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mazda 2 and Ford Fiesta are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 945 litres | |
| Mazda 2 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 99 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |