Mazda 2 2003 vs Seat Ibiza 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 engine produces 2 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, but torque is 5 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
| By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 2 is 3 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1044 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`530 kg | 1`620 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`085 kg | 1`106 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 445 kg | 514 kg | |
| Mazda 2 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Seat Ibiza. Therefore, Seat Ibiza is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |