Mazda 2 2003 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Mazda 2 engine produces 3 HP more power than Renault Clio, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is larger. Mazda 2 is 11 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 2 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Mazda 2 has 12 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |