Mazda 2 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005

 
Mazda 2
2003 - 2006
Mitsubishi Colt
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP68 HP
Torque: 160 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15 seconds14.4 seconds
Mazda 2 and Mitsubishi Colt have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.9
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 2 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1140 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.81 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.54 m1.55 m
Mazda 2 is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 267 litres155 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1044 litres760 litres
Mazda 2 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 2 has 112 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 284 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5301`545
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14001600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 2 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv