Mazda 2 2003 vs Mazda 2 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Mazda 2 2003 and Mazda 2 2006 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
By specification Mazda 2 2003 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2006, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 2003 and Mazda 2 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 268 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1044 litres | |
Mazda 2 2003 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2 2006. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | 1`530 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
| |